Coronavirus Update

In response to rapidly developing public announcements related to Coronavirus, Cage & Miles can support consults and cases remotely due to our cutting edge technology for all employees and our cloud based firm management system. Our people can work remotely on all facets of client cases. In the unfortunate event that one or more of our people are exposed to the virus, our clients’ work does not need to stop. All client files are uploaded, secured and safely backed up on the cloud. We have contingency plans in place at our two offices to see that correspondence from the court, case professionals, opposing counsel, and service providers gets uploaded to our clients’ secured cloud file so our people can work remotely. We are ready, willing and able to keep your case moving forward during these uncertain times. Please contact us if you have questions about how public announcements affect your case. Please click here for more resources.

When and How to Seek a Child's Input in a Custody Dispute

A custody dispute can be a difficult time for the entire family. The last thing a parent wants to do is directly involve their children in the legal proceedings. There are times, however, where it is appropriate, and even very helpful to allow the court to hear the child’s perspective.

Under California Family Code section 3042, “if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason…and form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation, the court shall consider, and give due weight to, the wishes of the child…” If a child is mature enough to form a preference, then that child’s wishes are relevant to the custody proceedings. In fact, it can be an error for the court to not give weight to a mature child’s perspective.

Nonetheless, a child’s participation in family law matters will be considered on a case-by-case basis. There is no mandate for a child to participate in a custody case. No family is one and the same, and so the court will still use its discretion for each case to decide if the child should be interviewed or called as a witness. There are several considerations to be made when making this decision.

Child’s Input in Custody Case

The court is mainly concerned with a fine balance between protecting the child, hearing important input from the child, and making sure the parties (parents) are given the right to challenge this “evidence” provided in the form of a statement or testimony from their own children. This is particularly important when a child expresses his or her views in a form other than live testimony in court.

The most obvious consideration is the child’s age. A child who is at least age 14 and wishes to address the court regarding custody or visitation must be permitted to do so unless the court determines it would not be in the child’s best interests. If the court makes such a determination, it must state its reasons on the record. For a child under the age of 14, the analysis switches – the court will first determine it would be appropriate pursuant to the child’s best interests. The child no longer must be permitted to provide input, instead the child may provide input.

How does the court then decide of having the child address the court is in child’s best interest? The court will consider the following as guidelines:

  • Whether the child can form an intelligent preference regarding custody or parenting time;
  • Whether the child is of sufficient age and capacity to understand the nature of the testimony;
  • Whether information has been presented indicating that the child may be at risk emotionally if he or she is permitted (or denied) the opportunity to address the court;
  • Whether information has been presented indicating the child may benefit from addressing the court;
  • Whether the subject areas about which the child is anticipated to address the court are relevant to the court’s decision making process; and
  • Whether any other factors weigh in favor of (or against) having the child address the court, taking into consideration the child’s desire to do so.

Once the court determines it is in the child’s best interest to provide his or her input, then the court must follow certain guidelines for how it will receive this input. The court may allow a party or both parties to call the child as a witness and provide live, direct testimony in court. If the court deems it is not in the child’s best interest, the court must provide alternative means of obtaining the child’s preferences.

Under Calidornia Family Code section 3042, the following alternatives are permitted:

  • The child can participate in a Family Court Services (FCS) mediation, mandatory for all custody determinations. Usually the mediator will also interview the child separately, and include his or her input in the recommendations to the court;
  • Appointment of a child custody evaluator, investigator or counselor. This can be expensive to the parties, or to one party who insists on the use of an outside evaluator and may be ordered to pay for it.

If the court uses one of the above alternatives to calling the child as a witness, the child’s preference must be presented in a detailed writing and fully document the child’s views. The person who prepared the writing must also be available for testimony and cross-examination. Last, the child’s preference in writing must be kept confidential in the file, meaning it won’t be made available for public viewing, as are most family law cases should someone request it.

If the court decides to permit live testimony in the courtroom, it may consider closing the courtroom to the public, or hearing the child’s preference “in camera” which means in the judge’s chambers, outside of the courtroom altogether. The judge can also hear the child’s testimony away from the parents or attorneys, so that the child is more honest in what he/she says. If this is the case, the parties and their attorneys can request to submit questions they want the judge to ask and hear the response, instead of examining the child themselves on the stand.

Overall, the court will want to take extra measures to protect the child from any possible harassment or embarrassment and restrict any unnecessary repetition of questions. The court may consider appointing minor’s counsel to represent the child’s interest.